It’s inevitable that at some point, a merge conflict will arise in your git workflow. A merge conflict occurs when two branches have been changed independently and they both attempt to merge with conflicting changes. When this happens, git leaves the conflicting lines in the file, and you must manually resolve it in order to successfully complete the merge.
When attempting to resolve a git merge conflict, the first step is to determine what the conflicting change was. To do this, it’s best to look at the branch’s commit logs. This will show you who made the changes and when. It may also be helpful to look at the code that was changed and make sure you understand exactly what needs to be done to resolve the conflict.
Once you have identified the conflicting change, it’s time to make a decision on how to handle it. Do you want to keep the version from one branch or the other? Or, do you need to combine elements of each branch to make a new version? Decide which option is best for the project then proceed to make the necessary changes in the code.
After the changes have been made, the next step is to commit the new version and push it up to the remote repository. This will complete the merge and resolve the conflict.
It’s important to understand that merge conflicts are a normal part of git workflows, and they can often be quickly and easily resolved. As long as you take the time to assess the changes and decide on the best solution, you should be able to successfully merge your branches without any further issues.
